The Legacy of Deferred Compensation in Korea’s Administrative Reforms*
Received: Jun 30, 2012; Revised: Jul 03, 2012; Revised: Aug 06, 2012; Accepted: Aug 16, 2012
Published Online: Aug 31, 2012
Abstract
While New Public Management is becoming an established program for improving the quality of public administration, this study redirects our attention to the merits of an older system. Some of the public administration mechanisms that were reformed with the advent of democratization and globalization are argued in this study to have worked better than their newer versions. Using the Korean example, this study demonstrates that liberal political reforms may be harmful for public management, contrary to the usual expectations about their benefits. In the Korean bureaucracy, the disruption of deferred compensation— attractive post-retirement employment as a reward for policy performance during one’s tenure as a civil servant—impaired its organizational capacity, as policy autonomy dropped and corruption increased within the bureaucracy.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Revisiting Bureaucratic Dysfunction: The Role of Bureaucracy in Democratization*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(1):127-147.
Change and Continuity in Police Organizations: Institution, Legitimacy, and Democratization*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(1):149-174.
The Ceiling Strategy as Policy: Limiting Bureaucratic Expansion and Democratization*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(1):175-198.
Factors Influencing Human Resource Professionals’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Civil Service Reform in Six U.S. State Governments
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2013;28(1):67-91.
Comparison of Civil Service Reform in the United States and Korea: Central Personnel Agencies and Senior Civil Service Systems*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2012;27(3):101-123.