Article

The Legacy of Deferred Compensation in Korea’s Administrative Reforms*

Dongryul Kim 1
Author Information & Copyright
1Dongryul Kim is assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research interests include East Asian security and economics. His recent work has appeared in the North Korean Review and the Journal of Asian Studies (Korea). E-mail: dxkgsm@rit.edu.

© Copyright 2012 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 30, 2012; Revised: Jul 03, 2012; Revised: Aug 06, 2012; Accepted: Aug 16, 2012

Published Online: Aug 31, 2012

Abstract

While New Public Management is becoming an established program for improving the quality of public administration, this study redirects our attention to the merits of an older system. Some of the public administration mechanisms that were reformed with the advent of democratization and globalization are argued in this study to have worked better than their newer versions. Using the Korean example, this study demonstrates that liberal political reforms may be harmful for public management, contrary to the usual expectations about their benefits. In the Korean bureaucracy, the disruption of deferred compensation— attractive post-retirement employment as a reward for policy performance during one’s tenure as a civil servant—impaired its organizational capacity, as policy autonomy dropped and corruption increased within the bureaucracy.

Keywords: Korea, bureaucracy; deferred compensation; democratization; Civil Service Reform