Article

The Ceiling Strategy as Policy: Limiting Bureaucratic Expansion and Democratization*

Hyemin Choi1, Jisu Jeong2
Author Information & Copyright
1Hyemin (Hemin) Choi is a PhD student in the Graduate School of Public Administration at Seoul National University, Korea. E-mail: herahemin@snu.ac.kr
2Jisu Jeong is Senior Researcher at Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, Seoul, Korea. E-mail: rationeque@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: herahemin@snu.ac.kr.

© Copyright 2017 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 27, 2016; Revised: Jan 05, 2017; Revised: Feb 23, 2017; Accepted: Feb 24, 2017

Published Online: Apr 30, 2017

Abstract

It is commonly recognized that the transition to democracy in Korea was associated with economic progress. However, not many scholars have given attention to the role of bureaucracy during the process of democratization, due to the fact that bureaucracy is usually thought of as belonging to politics, not democracy. As a refutation of this general view, first, this paper argues that bureaucracy has been an important contributor to political modernization. Since the post-1945 period, the ‘ceiling’ strategy, which limits the total number of civil servants, was introduced into the personnel management method and system of checks and balances to limit undue political influence over staffing and to control bureaucratic expansion. Second, through this strategy as policy, the bureaucracy legitimately tried to avoid undemocratic political power by the standardized process and allow the coordination. The ceiling policy is originally the product of historical context during colonial and authoritarian period, but the bureaucracy utilizes it as the instrument to reduce corruption. The contribution of this paper is provoking the new insights about democratization from bureaucrat’s perspective which is rarely highlighted.

Keywords: Ceiling Law; Bureaucratic Expansion; Democratization; Personnel Management