Article

Change and Continuity in Police Organizations: Institution, Legitimacy, and Democratization*

Wonhyuk Cho 1
Author Information & Copyright
1Wonhyuk Cho is Senior Lecturer in the School of Government at the Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: wonhyuk.cho@vuw.ac.nz.

© Copyright 2017 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 27, 2016; Revised: Jan 05, 2017; Revised: Feb 20, 2017; Accepted: Feb 24, 2017

Published Online: Apr 30, 2017

Abstract

This article analyzes how institutional pressures have allowed for continuities as well as brought about changes in modern police organizations in Korea. When facing a legitimacy crisis, the Korean law enforcement system has typically responded with organizational restructuring. Strong myth-building patterns compensate for the lack of moral legitimacy of the police, particularly under authoritarian-military regimes that suppress democratization movements in Korea. Even after seemingly radical organizational changes aimed at placing the police under democratic control, highly institutionalized core structures of the police remain in place. Performance reform after the economic crisis, which was proceeded from reformers’ shared belief in the market-driven solutions, diagnosed the Korean police as a big, inefficient, and self-serving bureaucracy, a diagnosis that eventually caused gradual deterioration in the taken-for-granted-ness of policing activities. The internet and social media made the Korean police even more vulnerable to external challenges and a questioning of its legitimacy.

Keywords: institution; legitimacy; policing; democratization