Change and Continuity in Police Organizations: Institution, Legitimacy, and Democratization*
Received: Dec 27, 2016; Revised: Jan 05, 2017; Revised: Feb 20, 2017; Accepted: Feb 24, 2017
Published Online: Apr 30, 2017
Abstract
This article analyzes how institutional pressures have allowed for continuities as well as brought about changes in modern police organizations in Korea. When facing a legitimacy crisis, the Korean law enforcement system has typically responded with organizational restructuring. Strong myth-building patterns compensate for the lack of moral legitimacy of the police, particularly under authoritarian-military regimes that suppress democratization movements in Korea. Even after seemingly radical organizational changes aimed at placing the police under democratic control, highly institutionalized core structures of the police remain in place. Performance reform after the economic crisis, which was proceeded from reformers’ shared belief in the market-driven solutions, diagnosed the Korean police as a big, inefficient, and self-serving bureaucracy, a diagnosis that eventually caused gradual deterioration in the taken-for-granted-ness of policing activities. The internet and social media made the Korean police even more vulnerable to external challenges and a questioning of its legitimacy.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Improving Governmental Transparency in Korea: Toward Institutionalized and ICT-Enabled Transparency*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2014;29(1):69-100.
Institutional Change and Economic Growth in East Asia after the Asian Financial Crisis, 1997-98
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(1):29-51.
Do Policy and Institutional Variables Play a More Significant Role in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment to Eastern Africa than They Do in Other Regions of Sub-Saharan Africa?
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2018;33(2):41-51.
Socioeconomic Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa with Reference to Southeast Asia: Natural Resources or Institutions?
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(3):1-27.
Revisiting Bureaucratic Dysfunction: The Role of Bureaucracy in Democratization*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(1):127-147.