Impartial, Skilled, Respect for Law: The Ancient Ideals of Civil Servants at the root of Eastern and Western Traditions
Received: Dec 23, 2019; Revised: Jan 03, 2020; Revised: Feb 25, 2020; Accepted: Feb 28, 2020
Published Online: Apr 30, 2020
Abstract
When studying civil service traditions, scholars often contrast the Eastern, Confucian tradition from the Western, Weberian tradition. A few Korean and American scholars pointed out that the two traditions are not that different. It is argued in this article that they are not, because they are both grounded in the ancient Egyptian wisdom literature about what makes a good civil servant. They are impartial in their dealings with people, the have the administrative and technical skills necessary, and they respect the rule of law. The ancient Egyptian, Confucian, and Weberian traditions are visible in the work of Yu Hyongwon, a 17th century Korean scholar and civil servant.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Civil Service Reforms and the Development of Korea
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2014;29(1):47-67.
Factors Influencing Human Resource Professionals’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Civil Service Reform in Six U.S. State Governments
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2013;28(1):67-91.
Comparison of Civil Service Reform in the United States and Korea: Central Personnel Agencies and Senior Civil Service Systems*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2012;27(3):101-123.
Transition from the Developmental State: The Deliberative Policy Process of Civil Service Pension Reform in Korea*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2011;26(3):91-111.
Civil Service Reform in Participatory Government: Civil Service System in Transition*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2007;22(1):19-45.
