Transition from the Developmental State: The Deliberative Policy Process of Civil Service Pension Reform in Korea*
Received: Oct 24, 2011; Revised: Oct 26, 2011; Revised: Nov 22, 2011; Accepted: Dec 01, 2011
Published Online: Dec 31, 2011
Abstract
This paper examines three recent efforts to reform Korea’s Civil Service Pension Program, in order to trace the changing policy process in Korea, where the policy regime of the developmental state used to be predominant. It has been argued that the government no longer has overwhelming influence over the policy-making process, while social actors are not able to compromise on social issues. This paper aims to test the hypotheses of the decline of government influence and the inability to reach social compromise, focusing on stakeholders’ interactions at the micro level. It argues that a new deliberative policy process has emerged that engages a range of stakeholders, such as trade unions and policy experts, and in which different government ministries compete against each other. The paradox of the new policy process is that despite its deliberative nature, the government’s strategic influence continues to be strong.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Strange Bedfellows: Cooperative Policy Making in a Divided Government
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(2):25-46.
Higher Public Service Motivation for Accepting Public Sector Pension Reform? Evidence from Korean Government Organizations*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2019;34(1):13-42.
Nigerian Pension Reform 2004-2010: Great Leap or Inappropriate Policy Design?*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2010;25(2):13-37.
Local Discretion and Environmental Policy Making in South Korea: Three Models and a Test
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2016;31(3):1-26.
Precarious Working Youth and Pension Reform in the Republic of Korea and Italy*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2013;28(3):51-75.