Article

Nigerian Pension Reform 2004-2010: Great Leap or Inappropriate Policy Design?*

Jörg Michael Dostal 1
Author Information & Copyright
1Jörg Michael Dostal is Assistant Professor in the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, Korea. His research interests include comparative politics, global social policy, and the role of knowledge and expertise in the policy process. E-mail: jmdostal@snu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2010 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 10, 2010; Revised: Jun 22, 2010; Revised: Jul 06, 2010; Accepted: Aug 02, 2010

Published Online: Aug 31, 2010

Abstract

This paper analyses early results of the 2004 Nigerian pension reform. At the beginning of 2010, the new system of privately managed, funded pension accounts covered around four million Nigerians in a country with a workforce of around 50 million people. The study focuses on shortcomings of the new system. Most crucially, the reform has failed to contribute to basic social security in old age for the majority of Nigerians employed in the informal sector. Moreover, the minority of covered workers are also likely to experience problems. The study demonstrates in a model calculation that the funded accounts have so far produced negative real returns for pension savers. It is suggested that shortcomings of the current system are unlikely to be addressed by reform within the existing paradigm and that alternative policies, such as noncontributory universal social pensions, should be considered to expand basic social security in the Nigerian context.

Keywords: basic social security agenda; Nigeria; pension reform; social pensions