Image Re-branding in a Fragile State: The Case of Nigeria*
Received: May 05, 2013; Revised: May 25, 2013; Revised: Aug 06, 2013; Accepted: Aug 08, 2013
Published Online: Aug 31, 2013
Abstract
In today’s globalized world, nations are increasingly concerned about how they are perceived by their publics, often carefully planning and executing policies to maintain a positive identity or shed a negative image. While some countries are able to execute nation branding, others are not. Using the Nigerian experience as a case study, this article shows how the character of a state can undermine its capacity for successful nation branding. We argue that countries are judged not just by what they say but also by what they do, and that inherent contradictions such as sectarian violence, ethnic tension, and corruption underline Nigeria’s underdevelopment and its reputation at home and abroad. We assess this trajectory in the context of state fragility and “prebendalization” politics in a country with a powerful colonial legacy, and suggest a duality of order and disorder involving formal and informal structures of governance that impinge significantly on re-branding efforts.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Tonic or Toxin? The State, Neopatrimonialism, and Anticorruption Efforts in Nigeria
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2013;28(1):111-134.
The Corruption-Incompetence Nexus: Analysis of Corrupt US Mayors
J. Policy Stud. 2022;37(2):1-12.
Corruption and Financial Management: Evidence from Korean Local Governments*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2015;30(2):177-192.
The Impact of Official Development Assistance on Government Effectiveness: The Mediating Effect of Corruption*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2015;30(2):193-216.
Impact of Global Capitalism on the Environment of Developing Economies: The Case of Nigeria
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2014;29(3):79-100.