Metropolitan Governance Matters: The Low Economic Performance of Metropolitan Cities in South Korea
Received: Feb 10, 2019; Revised: Feb 23, 2019; Revised: Mar 15, 2019; Accepted: Mar 18, 2019
Published Online: Apr 30, 2019
Abstract
This study undertakes an empirical analysis to identify the determinants of the low economic performance of major metropolitan cities in Korea. Using panel data of the metropolitan cities between 2000 to 2016, I carried out ageneralized least square estimation and obtained the following results. First, traditional explanatory variables such as capital investment, labor force, and R&D investments are highly significant with positive expected signs. Second, nationallevel governance arrangements for the metropolitan cities have negative impacts on the economic performance of the cities. Last, the impacts of subnational governance arrangements on economic performance are not entirely conclusive. These pieces of evidence suggest that improving the economic performance of the metropolitan cities may require a restructuring of the current framework of metropolitan governance.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Socioeconomic Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa with Reference to Southeast Asia: Natural Resources or Institutions?
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(3):1-27.
The Influence of State Ownership on the Economic Performance of Korean Public Companies
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2013;28(1):1-16.
Institutional Change and Economic Growth in East Asia after the Asian Financial Crisis, 1997-98
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(1):29-51.
Evaluating Performance-Based Contracting in Welfare-to-Work Programs: Selection and Earnings Gain Effects in Wisconsin Works*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2016;31(1):31-61.
Organizational Capacity, Community Asset Mobilization, and Performance of Korean Social Enterprises*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2015;30(2):69-91.