The Inclusion of Health in County Comprehensive Planning
Received: Feb 10, 2014; Revised: Mar 03, 2014; Revised: Mar 31, 2014; Accepted: Apr 02, 2014
Published Online: Apr 30, 2014
Abstract
This article explores what drives communities in United States to include health objectives in their comprehensive plans. By using a place-based approach, this model is able to take into account variables such as health status, social equity, political institutions, and built environment. The findings suggest that communities are more likely to adopt health as a goal based on their political institutional structure and environmental quality (e.g., air pollution) than based on health status and social equity factors. Therefore, communities are responding to poor health and heightened mortality per se but rather to environmental factors that are associated with poor health outcomes.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Interim Evaluation of South Korea’s Response to COVID-19 and Preparation for a Post-COVID-19 World in Public Health
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(3):169-190.
Public Health Disasters and the Evolution of Pandemic Response Structures: A Case Study of MERS in Korea*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(1):27-52.
High stakes: a quantitative analysis of local cannabis policies and residential property sale prices in New Jersey
J. Policy Stud. 2024;39(4):35-53.
Coordination, Incentives, and Persuasion: South Korea’s Comprehensive Approach to COVID-19 Containment*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(3):119-139.