Public Health Disasters and the Evolution of Pandemic Response Structures: A Case Study of MERS in Korea*
Received: Oct 25, 2016; Revised: Nov 01, 2016; Revised: Mar 06, 2017; Accepted: Mar 08, 2017
Published Online: Apr 30, 2017
Abstract
This study focuses on the Korean MERS epidemic and analyzes how governance structures were set up to respond to it. Compared to other countries’ responses, which were built on both hierarchical and network structures, the Korean MERS response structure evolved over time. In the first period hierarchy characterized the relationship between the central government and hospitals. In the second period, heterarchy replaced hierarchy, and in the last period heterarchy evolved into a network governance structure. Furthermore, it was found that leadership, communication, information sharing and use of information technology affected the formation of the response structures. I conclude by exploring limitations in my research and suggesting paths and perspectives for further research.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
How Do Intercrisis Learning Outcomes Affect Intracrisis Learning? “Learning in the Making” in the Case of South Korea’s COVID-19 Response
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(3):95-118.
Interim Evaluation of South Korea’s Response to COVID-19 and Preparation for a Post-COVID-19 World in Public Health
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(3):169-190.
Business Associations and the Developmental State in Korea The Case of the Machinery Industry in the 1960 and 1970s*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(3):29-51.
The Koreanization of the Australian Sex Industry: A Policy and Legislative Challenge
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2011;26(3):13-36.
The Hierarchy-Oriented Bureaucracy of South Korea: A Type of Neo-Weberian State?
J. Policy Stud. 2024;39(2):51-62.