The Influence of Contextual Factors on Collective Actions for Locating Facilities with Externalities: Applying the Institutional Collective Action Framework
Received: Jan 06, 2012; Revised: Feb 08, 2012; Revised: Mar 29, 2012; Accepted: Apr 04, 2012
Published Online: Apr 30, 2012
Abstract
This study applies the Institutional Collective Action Framework to two cases: proposals for the construction of Taekwondo Park and the location of a nuclear waste dump site in Booahn. While the proposed park caused excessive competition because its benefits were overestimated and its private goods were considered necessary, the proposed nuclear waste site resulted in excessive conflict because of uncertainty about its potential harms and because its public goods were considered unnecessary. The former case showed homogeneity of political power and cooperation based on trust, whereas the latter case showed heterogeneity of political power and conflict based on distrust. Both cases showed politicians’ active participation based on their reelection goals and a blocked network structure between central and local governments. Stakeholders in both cases showed strong internal ties with other stakeholders with similar potential political and economic benefits.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Vicious Circle of Public Conflicts, Conflict Behaviors, and Public Trust in South Korea*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2017;32(3):53-81.
Executive-Legislative Conflict and Regulation Outcomes: The Case of the U.S. FCC
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2016;31(3):75-99.
Interorganizational Competition and Government Competitiveness: The Case of the Korean Central Government*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2015;30(2):93-118.
Daechuri as Symbolic Battleground: Failure to Integrate Divergent Frames for Conflict Interpretation
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2012;27(3):27-45.
Female Constituency, Electoral Competition, and Local Maternity Policy in Korea
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2012;27(2):121-142.