Article

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENTS in AUSTRALIA: LESSONS an NPM LEADER MIGHT TODAY DRAW FROM NWS

Andrew Podger 1
Author Information & Copyright
1College of Arts and Social Sciences , Australian National University

ⓒ Copyright 2024 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 07, 2024; Accepted: Jun 03, 2024

Published Online: Jun 30, 2024

Abstract

Australian public administration has undergone a dramatic change over the last 50 years through a long series of incremental, pragmatic reforms. Australia was a leader in New Public Management in the 1980s and 1990s, subsequently incorporating New Public Governance measures of collaboration and networking. While some critics describe the transformation as “neo-liberalism”, this article favors the more neutral term, “managerialism”, recognizing its liberal aspects but challenging claims of rolling back the role of the state. Reflecting on the overall shift today, the author concludes that the measures delivered significant gains but were taken too far, and important balances were lost. Looking towards the future, this article calls for a major correction including reinvestment in the state, not necessarily as far as adoption of Pollitt and Bouckaert’s Neo-Weberian State, but drawing important lessons from that paradigm.

Keywords: New Public Management; New Public Governance; Neo-Weberian State; neoliberalism; managerialism; politicisation; Australia