Delivering Development to Gender-conscious Communities in S. Korea: What Factors Matter?
Received: Jun 19, 2017; Revised: Jun 23, 2017; Revised: Aug 04, 2017; Accepted: Aug 07, 2017
Published Online: Aug 31, 2017
Abstract
This paper aims to suggest an alternative monitoring framework for the WFC (Women-Friendly City) project that can have an impact on the performance of the WFC project. In particular, this study looks at the mutual relationships between the factors of the framework that was suggested through the analysis of the project-related interviewees’ accounts of qualitative research. Path analysis was carried out to analyze the relationship between the six variables – independent (Institutional Resources), parametric (PPCo or Public-Public Cooperation), Education, PPP (Public-Private Partnership) and dependent (Performance and (Gender) Representation). As a result, it was found that Institutional Resources, PPCo, and PPP had a significant influence on Performance and Representation. In particular, there were four statistical associations (paths): Institutional Resources → Performance, PPCo → Performance, PPCo → Representation, and PPP → Representation (p<0.05).
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Symbolic Representation in American Schools: Race, Gender, and Intersectionality
J. Policy Stud. 2022;37(4):57-76.
Interim Evaluation of South Korea’s Response to COVID-19 and Preparation for a Post-COVID-19 World in Public Health
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2020;35(3):169-190.