Employment-Friendly Welfare Policy and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from Sweden and Korea*
Received: Feb 15, 2016; Revised: Mar 05, 2016; Revised: Mar 23, 2016; Accepted: Mar 24, 2016
Published Online: Apr 30, 2016
Abstract
This paper provides a simple theoretical framework for analyzing how welfare polices can affect the incentive to work and compares the recent welfare policy reforms of Sweden and Korea. Sweden has systematically reformed its welfare policies in response to slowing population and economic growth and an aging population. This paper shows that recent Swedish reforms of tax policies and unemployment benefits bear out theoretical predictions that such reforms will help reduce moral hazard and adverse selection problems. In comparison, recent Korean reforms of tax policies and unemployment benefits have focused on moral hazard problems but have largely ignored adverse selection problems.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Employment-Friendly Welfare Policy and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from Sweden and Korea*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2016;31(2):1-22.
A Historical-Institutionalist Analysis of the MV Sewol and MS Estonia Tragedies: Policy Lessons from Sweden for South Korea*
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2015;30(1):35-71.
Comparative Analysis of Health Care Systems in Three Developed Countries: Germany, Sweden and the United States
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2003;17(2):27-48.
Another Injustice? Socio-Spatial Disparity of Drinking Water Information Dissemination Rule Violation in the United States
J. Policy Stud. 2022;37(4):77-89.
Comparing the Arrangements of Governance and Sustainable Development in OECD Countries: Coupled or Decoupled?
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2019;34(1):99-117.