Article

The Institutionalization of the Presidential Secretariat in Korea, 1948-2011*

Yong-duck Jung1, Yoon-ho Lee2, Hyun-Jong Yoo3
Author Information & Copyright
1Yong-duck Jung is a professor in the Graduate School of Public Administration at Seoul National University.
2Yoon-ho Lee is a doctoral student in the Graduate School of Public Administration at Seoul National University.
3Hyun-Jong Yoo is a professor at the Korean Civic Education Institute for Democracy.

© Copyright 2012 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 21, 2012; Revised: Oct 23, 2012; Revised: Dec 06, 2012; Accepted: Dec 12, 2012

Published Online: Dec 31, 2012

Abstract

This article analyzes the institutionalization of the presidential secretariat (PS) in Korea from 1948 to the present. The PS was poorly institutionalized from the 1940s to the 1960s, but it has rapidly expanded and differentiated since 1968. Although presidents since the democratic transition in 1987 have effectively controlled any expansion of the number of senior secretaries, the PS’s total size has continued to increase, especially during the latter part of each administration. It has undergone institutional experiments responding to changing environmental challenges. The PS has become a core institution for executive and economic policy functions since 1968, at which time its expenditures began to increase steadily, enhancing its autonomy. And, socio-cultural, welfare, and education affairs have been a particular focus of institutionalization since 1987. The PS has been highly professionalized, staffed mainly with public servants and experts rather than politicians. This has caused it to be oriented toward the long term and consistency rather than the short term and flexibility.

Keywords: presidential secretariat; institutional presidency; Blue House; core executive; executive leadership; Korean government