Social Service Contracting-Out in Korea and Japan: Municipal Governments, Nonprofit Contractors, and Local Residents*
Received: Oct 19, 2011; Revised: Oct 21, 2011; Revised: Mar 27, 2011; Accepted: Apr 06, 2011
Published Online: Apr 30, 2011
Abstract
Focusing on the role of local residents’ participation in nonprofit social service contracting-out, this research has three aims. The first is to reveal the commonalities and differences in the relationships among municipal governments, contractors, and local residents in Korea and Japan through the use of survey data. We observed several common elements between the two countries regarding the relationship between municipal governments and nonprofit contractors. However, the relationships between nonprofit contractors and local residents were quite different in each country because of their different local selfgoverning environments. The second is to identify the current types of local residents’ participation in contracting-out, and to categorize them into inclusion of local residents as members of contractors, participation of local residents in governance mechanisms, open meetings, and involvement of local residents as volunteers. The final aim is to ascertain whether there are statistical differences between the respondents’ perceptions in the two countries regarding the effects of local residents’ participation on service responsiveness. Using an independent sample t-test analysis, we verified that Japanese municipal managers had more positive and statistically significant perceptions regarding the effects of open meetings, and Korean nonprofit managers had more positive and statistically significant perceptions regarding the effects of involvement as volunteers.
Metrics
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Comparison of Fiscal and Distributional Effects of VAT Exemptions in Korea and Japan
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2018;33(2):1-39.
The Evolution of Welfare Production Regimes in East Asia: A Comparative Study of Korea, Japan, and Taiwan
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2011;26(1):49-75.
Genesis of the Russia-Japan Conundrum in Northeast Asian Security: The Anatomy of Mutual Distrust and the China Factor
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2021;36(1):15-26.
Anatomy of the Republic of Korea’s Niche Strategic Engagement in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS): ROK’s Tailor-Made Strategy and its Security Policy Implication
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2019;34(3):97-121.
Local Discretion and Environmental Policy Making in South Korea: Three Models and a Test
Korean J. Policy Stud. 2016;31(3):1-26.