Korean Journal of Policy Studies
Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University
Article

What Motivates Software Piracy in China: Q-Methodology Perspective

Chanwoo Kim1, Mao Xuewen2, Hyosung Park3, Kwangho Jung4
1Chanwoo Kim is a PhD candidate in the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. Email: carfedm@snu.ac.kr.
2Mao Xuewen is a professor in the School of Management at Lanzhou University. Email: mxw5885@163.com.
3Hyosung Park is a master’s student in Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. Email: estherpkim@snu.ac.kr.
4Kwangho Jung, is a professor at the Korea Institute of Public Affairs and the Institute of Information, Knowledge and Public Policy at Graduate School of Public Administraton, Seoul National University. Email: kwjung77@gmail.com.
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: kwjung77@gmail.com.

© Copyright 2017 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 23, 2017; Revised: Jul 14, 2017; Revised: Aug 18, 2017; Accepted: Aug 28, 2017

Published Online: Aug 31, 2017

Abstract

This study explores why Chinese consumers use pirated software programs and how they think about their illegal use, relying on Q methodology. We developed 32 Q statements that outline reasons for using pirated software and surveyed 30 respondents from public officials, and software companies employees to students, professors, researchers, and the public. We developed four Q factors to describe four types of response to the use of pirated software. One group addresses a normative legal response, the second makes an economic utility argument, the third calls for punishing violators, and the fourth claims that they find themselves facing an uncomfortable dilemma in having to choose between the cheapness of illegal software and its illegality. Chinese respondents believe that government intervention can reduce the extent of illegal use (normative legal) and that intellectual property should be protected (economic utility). Furthermore, they acknowledged that the illegal use of software is a socio-structural problem across all social groups rather than a problem of a specific demographic group, such as a group of teenagers. Future research is required to explore not only whether or not perceptions regarding the use of illegal software vary from country to country but also how Confucian culture and norms are related to attitudes about the widespread use of counterfeit products in Asian countries.

Keywords: software piracy; Q methodology; comparative cultural analysis