Korean Journal of Policy Studies
Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University
Article

A Study of Performance Information Use and Credibility in Performance Management Systems: Focusing on the Self-Evaluation System*

Kwang-Hee Lee1, Seog-Min Lee2
1Kwang-Hee Lee, first author, is a research fellow at the Korean Institute of Public Administration. E-mail: kwhelee@kipa.re.kr.
2Seog-Min Lee, is an associate professor in the Department of Public Administration at the University of Suwon. E-mail: newmind68@suwon.ac.kr.
*Corresponding Author : E-mail: newmind68@suwon.ac.kr.

© Copyright 2015 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 08, 2015; Revised: Jun 24, 2015; Revised: Aug 01, 2015; Accepted: Aug 06, 2015

Published Online: Aug 31, 2015

Abstract

This study aims to identify types of information use in South Korea’s performance management system and the level of credibility accorded to these types of information use, along with the factors that affect them. The results show that use of performance measures is passive rather than instrumental and conceptual, while credibility accorded the system is low, and that the main factors that influence the system’s use and credibility are leadership commitment and usefulness of information. These findings suggest that the current performance management system in Korea is not being well used and that a change is in order. In particular, external factors, such as reform of the U.S. system, might act as key drivers for change in the near future.

Keywords: Public Performance; performance management system; performance information use